All problem comparisons · Campaign
Subcritical Shock: Euler and ADER2
Reference: no supplied analytic or digitized numerical profile. Ensman (1994), Figure 9, is the existing published numerical comparison target. Its curves are not embedded; the local Cartesian adaptation differs from that original setup.
Ensman (1994). Method-to-method differences below measure disagreement, not error against an exact solution. Per-method pages retain their numerical resolution comparisons.
Coupled ADER2 accuracy remains under investigation. A completed run or a small difference does not establish uniform second-order accuracy.
Revision 6 validation limits. Streaming-wave temporal-order thresholds failed at limiter transitions even with resolved references. Optically thick radiation temporal probes remain unresolved under the unchanged 1e-12 measurement guard. Strict stiff coupled temporal tests have not been rerun for revision 6 and remain an open limitation.
Level 2
Euler (first order): pending.
Coupled ADER2: interrupted.
Level 3
Euler (first order): pending.
Coupled ADER2: pending.
Level 4
Euler (first order): pending.
Coupled ADER2: pending.
How these comparisons are measured
All field values use the saved units (CGS for the seven original problems; normalized units for Marshak). The central profiles share x coordinates and the positive row adjacent to y = z = 0. Adaptive leaf-cell averages are prolonged as constants onto the finest common Cartesian x-y partition, with no extrapolation or time interpolation. Different leaf sizes may average different z extents adjacent to the plane. The plotted curves therefore represent the saved finite-volume slices.
Slice L₁ is mean absolute difference, L₂ is root-mean-square difference, and L∞ is maximum absolute difference, with area weighting. These are two-dimensional slice diagnostics. The separately labeled solver norms cover the full volume.
Each method uses its own saved cell-average reference where supplied; finer meshes can change the sampled reference.