All problem comparisons · Campaign

Streaming Wave: Euler and ADER2

Reference: exact analytic solution. Exact nonlinear M1 periodic-advection cell averages.

Coupled ADER2 accuracy remains under investigation. A completed run or a small difference does not establish uniform second-order accuracy.

Revision 6 validation limits. Streaming-wave temporal-order thresholds failed at limiter transitions even with resolved references. Optically thick radiation temporal probes remain unresolved under the unchanged 1e-12 measurement guard. Strict stiff coupled temporal tests have not been rerun for revision 6 and remain an open limitation.

Level 2

Euler (first order): complete results, parameters and reference discussion

Coupled ADER2: complete results, parameters and reference discussion

matched. No other refinement level or physical time is substituted for a missing partner.

Level 2 method and available reference profile overlays

Matched profile coordinates and values (CSV)

ADER2 minus Euler: slice discrepancy

FieldUnitsL₁L₂L∞
Radiation energy densityerg/cm^33.974018e-024.133068e-024.785348e-02
Radiation flux xerg/(cm^2 s)6.368198e+086.623069e+087.668320e+08
Radiation flux yerg/(cm^2 s)9.552297e+089.934603e+081.150248e+09
Radiation flux zerg/(cm^2 s)3.184099e+083.311534e+083.834160e+08

Euler (first order) versus exact analytic solution

Area-weighted errors on this method’s original leaf slice.

FieldUnitsL₁L₂L∞
Radiation energy densityerg/cm^35.075526e-026.418457e-021.191588e-01
Radiation flux xerg/(cm^2 s)8.133318e+081.028531e+091.909470e+09
Radiation flux yerg/(cm^2 s)1.219998e+091.542796e+092.864204e+09
Radiation flux zerg/(cm^2 s)4.066659e+085.142654e+089.547348e+08
Solver-reported full-volume reference norms
FieldUnitsL₁L₂L∞
Radiation energy densityerg/cm^35.075526e-026.418457e-021.191588e-01
Radiation flux xerg/(cm^2 s)8.133318e+081.028531e+091.909470e+09
Radiation flux yerg/(cm^2 s)1.219998e+091.542796e+092.864204e+09
Radiation flux zerg/(cm^2 s)4.066659e+085.142654e+089.547348e+08

Source slice CSV · Run metadata

Coupled ADER2 versus exact analytic solution

Area-weighted errors on this method’s original leaf slice.

FieldUnitsL₁L₂L∞
Radiation energy densityerg/cm^37.740758e-029.514244e-021.633612e-01
Radiation flux xerg/(cm^2 s)1.240424e+091.524618e+092.617795e+09
Radiation flux yerg/(cm^2 s)1.860636e+092.286927e+093.926693e+09
Radiation flux zerg/(cm^2 s)6.202120e+087.623089e+081.308898e+09
Solver-reported full-volume reference norms
FieldUnitsL₁L₂L∞
Radiation energy densityerg/cm^37.740758e-029.514244e-021.633612e-01
Radiation flux xerg/(cm^2 s)1.240424e+091.524618e+092.617795e+09
Radiation flux yerg/(cm^2 s)1.860636e+092.286927e+093.926693e+09
Radiation flux zerg/(cm^2 s)6.202120e+087.623089e+081.308898e+09

Source slice CSV · Run metadata

Quantitative comparison and input hashes (JSON)

Level 3

Euler (first order): complete results, parameters and reference discussion

Coupled ADER2: complete results, parameters and reference discussion

matched. No other refinement level or physical time is substituted for a missing partner.

Level 3 method and available reference profile overlays

Matched profile coordinates and values (CSV)

ADER2 minus Euler: slice discrepancy

FieldUnitsL₁L₂L∞
Radiation energy densityerg/cm^33.523321e-023.847428e-027.191846e-02
Radiation flux xerg/(cm^2 s)5.645974e+086.165342e+081.152463e+09
Radiation flux yerg/(cm^2 s)8.468961e+089.248013e+081.728695e+09
Radiation flux zerg/(cm^2 s)2.822987e+083.082671e+085.762316e+08

Euler (first order) versus exact analytic solution

Area-weighted errors on this method’s original leaf slice.

FieldUnitsL₁L₂L∞
Radiation energy densityerg/cm^34.639050e-025.446053e-021.012121e-01
Radiation flux xerg/(cm^2 s)7.433884e+088.727072e+081.621881e+09
Radiation flux yerg/(cm^2 s)1.115083e+091.309061e+092.432821e+09
Radiation flux zerg/(cm^2 s)3.716942e+084.363536e+088.109404e+08
Solver-reported full-volume reference norms
FieldUnitsL₁L₂L∞
Radiation energy densityerg/cm^34.639050e-025.446053e-021.012121e-01
Radiation flux xerg/(cm^2 s)7.433884e+088.727072e+081.621881e+09
Radiation flux yerg/(cm^2 s)1.115083e+091.309061e+092.432821e+09
Radiation flux zerg/(cm^2 s)3.716942e+084.363536e+088.109404e+08

Source slice CSV · Run metadata

Coupled ADER2 versus exact analytic solution

Area-weighted errors on this method’s original leaf slice.

FieldUnitsL₁L₂L∞
Radiation energy densityerg/cm^32.988865e-023.420566e-026.205922e-02
Radiation flux xerg/(cm^2 s)4.789530e+085.481313e+089.944730e+08
Radiation flux yerg/(cm^2 s)7.184295e+088.221969e+081.491709e+09
Radiation flux zerg/(cm^2 s)2.394765e+082.740656e+084.972365e+08
Solver-reported full-volume reference norms
FieldUnitsL₁L₂L∞
Radiation energy densityerg/cm^32.988865e-023.420566e-026.205922e-02
Radiation flux xerg/(cm^2 s)4.789530e+085.481313e+089.944730e+08
Radiation flux yerg/(cm^2 s)7.184295e+088.221969e+081.491709e+09
Radiation flux zerg/(cm^2 s)2.394765e+082.740656e+084.972365e+08

Source slice CSV · Run metadata

Quantitative comparison and input hashes (JSON)

Level 4

Euler (first order): pending.

Coupled ADER2: pending.

Quantitative comparison and input hashes (JSON)

How these comparisons are measured

All field values use the saved units (CGS for the seven original problems; normalized units for Marshak). The central profiles share x coordinates and the positive row adjacent to y = z = 0. Adaptive leaf-cell averages are prolonged as constants onto the finest common Cartesian x-y partition, with no extrapolation or time interpolation. Different leaf sizes may average different z extents adjacent to the plane. The plotted curves therefore represent the saved finite-volume slices.

Slice L₁ is mean absolute difference, L₂ is root-mean-square difference, and L∞ is maximum absolute difference, with area weighting. These are two-dimensional slice diagnostics. The separately labeled solver norms cover the full volume.

Each method uses its own saved cell-average reference where supplied; finer meshes can change the sampled reference.